CEOCFO Magazine,
Phone: 727-480-7070

Email: info@ceocfocontact.com

Weekly Digital Publication IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS WITH Top   CORPORATE EXECUTIVES (727) 480-7070 info@ceocfocontact.com FIND INTERVIEWS AND ARTICLES

Business Services | Solutions

Medical | Biotech

Cannabis  | Hemp

Banking | FinTech | Capital

Government Services

Public Companies

Industrial | Resources

Clean Tech

Global | Canadian



Lynn Fosse, Senior Editor

Steve Alexander, Associate Editor

Bud Wayne, Editorial Executive

Christy Rivers - Editorial Executive

Valerie Austin - Editorial Associate









Introduction

 

We are living in a world today that is full of threats and intimidation, the World Economic Forum and their Billionaires and politician members such as George Soros, and Justin Trudeau, are the invisible "Deep State" that wants to control us. The freedoms that we value so much are being eroded more and more each day. Social media companies within the Silicon Valley are marginalizing our liberties and have designed their own form of democracy. The pharmaceutical companies have taken over our health agencies. Government health agencies were established to serve and protect the public, but instead today, they are serving and protecting the pharmaceutical giants, their pay mastersThe best interests and well-being of the public are irrelevant. Instead, their focus was to help vaccine makers profit during the made up COVID-19 pandemic. They control the information we receive and manipulate our news feeds according to their desired outcomes. Those who subscribe to their platforms are unknowingly forced to conform to their will.

 

Schools are brainwashing our young children with far-left leaning, socialist ideologies being advanced by teachers without parental knowledge or consent. Additionally, an overwhelming majority of universities have adopted progressive agendas with the single goal of indoctrination. Schools and universities should teach science, math, art, and history without political bias, not their falsified political programs aimed at bringing down competitiveness, capitalism, and democracy as we know it.


Everyday there are more and more fringe groups being recognized as mainstream, and the majority are forced to accept their radical philosophies or risk being labeled as bigots and racists. Long held western values like honesty, integrity, Christianity, and hard work are being replaced with self-serving ideologies and counterculture dogma.

 

I lay the blame for much of this on three main groups; Silicon Valley technology companies, the liberal mainstream media and far-left radicals that are threatening our democracy. They want to make us one world, one people, and without religion. They are trying to take over the world, but it is time for us to take them over and nationalize those lying bastards. I have been warned by some to be less on point, more tactful, more diplomatic. My response is this: if we do not continue to conduct thorough research on these important topics and put out the facts as we know them, we will be like sheep being led to the slaughter believing everything they are told to believe by the big corporations that already control so much of our lives. Much of the content in my articles has been inspired by a genius, visionary friend of mine who wants no credit and chooses to remain anonymous.

 

Since the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic, I have authored more than 20 op-ed articles on the COVID-19 scam, climate change lies, and the stupidity of starting an unnecessary war in Ukraine.  Please visit my website and the links below to access those articles. Part one, part two, and part three will highlight how the European Union, the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand have already started down the path towards an irreversible economic decline.

https://emil-malak.com/

https://ceocfointerviews.com/emilmalakclimateoped22.html

https://ceocfointerviews.com/pdfs/Emil_Malak-Climate_Change_Op-ed_081021.pdf

 

December 9. 2022

Part Three

Climate Change Scam

 

Scientific conclusions should be founded on accurate data and or findings from assimilated experiments


Carbon dioxide only represents .0016% of the total percentage of atmospheric gases; an amount so negligible it is impossible to cause our climate change


It is total madness to suggest that one tenth of 1% of the atmospheric gases drastically could affect the climate


The total share of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is only 0.04%; the percentage of human caused CO2 is only .0016%. The entirety of Earth’s atmosphere is composed of about 78 percent nitrogen, 21 percent oxygen, 0.9 percent argon, and 0.1 percent other gases. Trace amounts of carbon dioxide, methane, water vapor, and neon are some of the other gases that make up the remaining 0.1 percent. Climate change alarmists go around scaring and shaming the public into agreeing to radical politically motivated decisions over trace amounts of so-called “greenhouse gases.” Where is the historic data or the data from scientific experiments that have been conducted that point to all the doom and gloom, they so loudly predict will upend life on Earth as we know it because of the “trace amounts” of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere? It is just not even mathematically possible for so much irreversible devastation to be caused by these tiny trace amounts of atmospheric gases. How can they pseudo scientists make such wild predictions without having any kind of past or experimental data upon which to base their claims? It is ludicrous for them to ascribe catastrophic conclusions because of trace amounts of gases that together add up to one tenth of one percent of the whole. Especially when the so-called science has been so politicized and is used as a tool for some leaders to increase their power.

 

A true and accurate description of climate change by renowned astrophysicist Piers Corbyn

 

A recent interview on the subject of climate change with a renowned astrophysicist did not go as the interviewer expected. The interviewer seemed very surprised when Corbyn did not regurgitate the popular climate change talking points we have all become used to hearing.

 

Corbyn, the founder of Weather Action stated the climate has always been changing, and the weather events taking place today have nothing to do with man. He said they had predicted there would be extreme heat in Eastern Europe and Russia this summer based on the circulation patterns which cause these kinds of weather events. He went on to explain that CO2 does NOT cause circulation patterns in the atmosphere.

 

When the frustrated interviewer said to Corbyn, “Man has got something to do this, hasn’t he?” The astrophysicist responded, “No, nothing to do with it. The only connection is man is here at the same time the sun and the moon are doing things.” He added, “They have nothing to do with mankind and those who say that are just trying to make money out of it” ……...” if you stop driving around Moscow, it won't affect next summer one jolt.”

 

When Corbyn was asked how come so many scientists disagree with him, he laughed and said, “they’re on a gravy train.”

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/bwaaahaha-climate-interview-didnt-go-as-planned/


Stopping fossil fuels, coal fired power plants, and shutting down nuclear power plants is not the answer; it will destroy civilization

 

C02 emissions are not causing climate change

 

It is impossible for one tenth of 1% of atmospheric gases to affect the climate

 

I fully support finding ways to intelligently reduce CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions. But when I heard so many make such outlandish claims of the impending doom about to destroy the planet, I had to do a deep dive and learn for myself if what they were saying was based on facts or just hyperbole. I found there was ZERO scientific evidence to substantiate their wild claims. Man made CO2 emissions and greenhouse gases have ZERO effect on changing the climate or causing weather disasters of any kind. When scientists make bold predictions with no backing data, their predictions are not scientific, they may as well be magic predictions because they are not founded on science. It has become a highly politicized green scam.

 

Before I conducted my own research, I too believed what they were telling us, and it was obviously concerning to me as a global citizen. However, after thoroughly studying the matter for myself I spit their Kool-Aid out as far as I could. I quickly realized the messaging they are bombarding us is geared to make us think the atmosphere is chock full of greenhouse gases. But when you study the matter for yourself you can see how all the hysteria they have managed to generate regarding climate change is totally baseless. They have created false doctrines over one-tenth of one percent of atmospheric gases. It does not take a rocket scientist to see through their deceit. Even if we were to shut down all nuclear plants, and end the use of fossil fuels, it would not make one drop of difference to the environment. Since the creation of the planet, temperatures and climate have been cyclical. We have had periods of cooling and warming including an ice age long before man appeared on the Earth. Let’s not flatter ourselves, the Earth is far bigger than we are, and our contribution to the climate is irrelevant.

 

Green parties have increased their political foothold in the United States and Europe by using scare tactics and panicking voters into believing a phony climate change narrative that is not rooted in science. The climate change scams fit nicely with the socialist agenda that is sweeping through Western countries with the objective of giving greater power to politicians. By weakening economies through out-of-control spending and borrowing they make individuals poorer and paint the government as the only solution. History has shown us time and time again that that is the way they can gain control over the masses. These unintelligent, self-proclaimed green politicians are preying on the ignorance of people and placing burdensome yokes on business and industry for the sole purpose of getting elected.

In an August 2021 op-ed, I addressed these climate change myths that are being used by unscrupulous politicians to push an agenda for more government control

Below is an excerpt from that article

 

“The total share of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is only 0.04%; the percentage of human caused CO2 is only .0016% We are constantly bombarded with claims that reckless amounts of CO2 emissions are being released into the atmosphere, but how much CO2 is really in the atmosphere? And how much of it is a result of human behavior? Let’s look at the facts. Ninety-nine percent of the atmosphere is made up of nitrogen (78%) and oxygen 21%). The remaining 1% is composed of other gases, mostly argon (0.096%) and only 0.04% is carbon dioxide (CO2). Of the total CO2, 95% is caused by natural forces of nature such as volcanoes, forest fires and natural decomposition processes. The human contribution of CO2 in the air makes up only 0.0016%. That is the amount that is emitted into the atmosphere as a result of human behavior like the extraction of coal and burning fossil fuels. Those are the facts. Human industrialization is only a very tiny contributor to CO2 emissions, but you would never know it by listening to the climate change alarmists. They use every natural occurrence as an excuse to assign blame to human behavior and industry. Whether there has been a flood, an earthquake, forest fires, heat waves, blizzards, or a volcanic eruption, activists always blame climate change as a way to scare us into making drastic changes and handing them more power.”

 

I am not a scientist, but I use my God given common sense. How can just a fraction of 1% of greenhouse gases wreak so much climate change havoc? It’s impossible; the math does not work.  And what about the other more than 99%? They manipulate their message because there are no facts to back their outlandish claims.

 

These unintelligent, self-proclaimed green politicians are preying on the ignorance of the masses and placing burdensome yokes on business and industry for the sole purpose of gaining greater control and reducing personal freedoms.

https://ceocfointerviews.com/pdfs/Emil_Malak-Climate_Change_Op-ed_081021.pdf

 

Climate change has nothing to do with greenhouse gases, today's politicians are simply "Stupid".

 

A few famous quotes attributed to my favorite scientist and true genius Albert Einstein, apply perfectly to the climate change politicians.

 

Claim: Albert Einstein once said or wrote "Two things are infinite: The universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe," 

 

 

“The height of stupidity is most clearly demonstrated by the individual who ridicules something he knows nothing about.” Albert Einstein

 

“The Difference Between Stupidity and Genius Is That Genius Has Its Limits” Albert Einstein

 

Common-sense is an attribute that for some reason many current Western leaders no longer possess. To quote some renowned thinkers on the topic:

 

"Common sense is not so common," Voltaire

 

Common sense is not a gift, it’s a punishment. Because you have to deal with everyone who doesn’t have it’ (unknown)

 

“It is a thousand times better to have common sense without education than to have education without common sense.” Robert G. Ingersoll 

 

 Last but not least , we all must speak-out.

 “You must be the change you wish to see in the world.” — Gandhi. ...


First Stupidity: how the hell can anyone scientifically back up claims that 1/10 of one percent of greenhouse gases can cause catastrophic climate disasters? Apparently common sense is not so common among so many politically motivated scammers calling themselves scientists.


Second Stupidity: politicians love to tout environmental issues to make us believe they are trying to save the world. The truth is, they only care about saving their jobs. There is no limit to their stupidity.


Third Stupidity: spending trillions of dollars on useless environmental issues knowing very well that even if the world moves completely away from fossil fuels and pivots 100% to green energy sources, it will not make a bit of difference to the climate, nor will it stop any natural weather occurrences that are being wrongly attributed to climate change.

https://ceocfointerviews.com/pdfs/Emil_Malak-Climate_Change_Op-ed_081021.pdf

 

Climate change lies, environmental rules, and green new deals, will destroy civilization


Does anyone really believe that if we were to ban the use of all fossil fuels, shut down all coal fired stations and all nuclear power plants, that we would somehow still be able to generate even 20% of all the energy needed throughout the world to maintain life as we know it? Is there any learned person that really thinks it's possible to provide enough energy for the 8 billion people who populate the globe using just solar, wind and hydrogen energy? Even if it were feasible, it would not be cost-effective. The cost to implement these alternatives to the average person would be equivalent to them paying more than $20 per gallon of gasoline. And even by some miracle it could be done, it would not stop a single tornado, hurricane, flood, heat wave, cold front, or any other natural weather phenomenon. They were all here long before the first barrel of oil was drilled, or the first ton of coal was mined. Man’s behavior has no impact on the climate or weather. The only thing climate change rules affect is our pocketbooks with their added rules, taxes, and carbon credits. Green spending bills will kickstart the eventual bankruptcy of North American and European economies.

 

Electric cars are not environmentally friendly and cause great anxiety

 

The truth may be hard to swallow but being politically correct makes me want to throw up!


The green parties are purposely destroying the average person’s hard-earned wealth. Why are many leaders focused on destroying their own industries as a result of green lies with no basis in scientific data?

 

The new green wave being forced upon the world is destroying our industrial output and seriously hampering economic progress. Even Tesla founder Elon Musk, who I personally admire for his industrial brilliance, agreed when he spoke to reporters outside of a conference in Norway this week saying, "Realistically, I think we need to use oil and gas in the short term, because otherwise civilization will crumble."

 

The current radical push to prematurely move away from fossil fuels is hurting Western economies and as Mr. Musk correctly stated will eventually cause civilization to “crumble.” 

 

Elon Musk is an innovative and marketing genius. Despite building Tesla from a startup into the leading electric car maker in the world, he is smart and honest in his acknowledgement that eliminating gas vehicles would destroy our way of life.

 

Interestingly, Toyota, the world’s largest car maker and the company that introduced the first hybrid car is not all in on making electric cars. They do not believe battery-electric vehicles are the only solution to producing more sustainable vehicles and achieving carbon neutrality. During a virtual Automotive Press Association meeting last month, executive vice president of sales at Toyota Motor North America, Jack Hollis said,

“For as much as people want to talk about EVs, the marketplace isn’t mature enough and ready enough ... at the level we would need to have mass movement.”

 

Contrary to what they are saying electric vehicles are horrible for the environment

 

Take a look at all the materials that go into making a single electric car battery:

 

30 pounds of lithium

60 pounds of cobalt

130 pounds of Nickel

90 pounds of copper

190 pounds of graphite

500 pounds of steel

Along with aluminum, manganese, plastic, and other materials.

 

Only 2% of cars today are electric or hybrid. There are not enough minerals in the world to convert all cars to electric. Imagine the damage we will create if we utilize most of our mineral resources to build electric cars. Those advocating for us to fully transition to electric cars are leaving many unanswered questions.

 

·       What about the electric grids responsible for charging car batteries?

·       How will all of that energy be generated?

·       How will we dispose of hundreds of millions of batteries when they are no longer functional?

 

Under the direction of their clueless governor Gavin Newsome, the state of California has banned the sale of new gas-powered vehicles beginning in 2035. In a comedic twist of irony Newsome announced his ridiculous plan to transition to all electric cars in the same week he is executing rolling blackouts, ordering citizens to raise their thermostats to 78 and 85 degrees, and begging Californians not to charge their current electric cars because the grid is not able to handle it during the current heat wave. How the hell will California survive in the future if they do somehow transition all their more than 30 million motor vehicles to electric when they can’t handle the little over one million electric cars they have now?

 

First-time EV owner shares ‘cautionary tale’ after it took 15 hours to drive 178 miles, and much anxiety

How practical will it become if California goes all out electric, imagine line-up of cars for hours, may be days trying to get charged, how stupid. A three-hour trip could take you a day or two.

Electric cars are only practical to drive around your city using up the 30 to 50 kilometers daily but not for long distsance. Buy a hybrid not fully electric.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/first-time-ev-owner-shares-cautionary-tale-15-hours-drive-178-miles

 

The empty suits and lost souls that make up the Hollywood elites embrace the climate change agenda to feel good about themselves

 

Leonardo Di Caprio has become the Hollywood poster child for climate change, another stupid person

 

Politicians who are following green party lunacy and ideology do not give a damn about the economic fallout their false climate policies will create

 

Bill Gates, and pea brained Hollywood elites like Leonardo DiCaprio and Jane Fonda, they attempt to control how we think, what we watch and all that we do. They feed us a steady diet of lies and misinformation. They attempt to control our behavior with false climate change ideology while they fly around the world in their private jets leaving behind bigger carbon footprints than that of small cities. Today’s incarnation of social media has become a 21st century anti-Christ.


I fully support fossil fuels; they are the reason we have modern civilization

 

Without fossil fuels like coal, civilization is doomed for failure, which is precisely the goal of the World Economic Forum, George Soros, the green parties, and left leaning political opportunists. The earth’s climate is designed to be cyclical. Temperature changes are normal and necessary. Since the beginning of time the earth has gone through prolonged cooling cycles known as ice ages and heating cycles called interglacial. Variances in temperature are part of the earth’s normal and natural weather cycles. But many are calling attention to these cycles and turning them into cataclysmic, life altering events. Just four years ago Alexandria Ocasio Cortez proclaimed to anyone that would listen that the world would end in twelve years. Soon after, European teenager Great Thunberg shortened it to ten years. They present no science or facts to back their apocalyptic claims because there are none. They know it’s a lie. People would act differently if they truly believed they were on the verge of the end of the world.

 

Unfortunately, European leaders are letting the inmates run the asylum and are listening to the unfounded lies of the doom and gloom prognosticators. They have imposed burdensome regulations and taxes that will have zero effect on the climate but will do everything to make them less competitive and allow China, India, and Russia to overtake them economically.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/13/why-toyota-the-worlds-largest-automaker-isnt-all-in-on-evs.html

 

North American and European countries have committed a grave mistake by departing from Industrial innovations

 

The USA and Europe are falling behind in innovative research within the industrial and manufacturing sectors. If they do change course and encourage a revival of new industrial innovation, we could be relegated to much weaker economic production and a decline in the future standard of living. Today's patent laws in the US are punishing inventors, making it impossible to monetize their inventions. Europe's patent system is not much different. As an inventor myself, I will never patent another invention in the United States. Instead, I will keep it as a trade secret and sell it to the Japanese. They take time but are honorable in their business dealings. As a result, I predict America and Europe will lose 50 million future industrial and manufacturing jobs that could have been created because of the coming nanotechnology revolution.

 

Will Japan move forward in exploring the future industrialization through advancement of nanotechnology applications?

 

They have the capabilities; I trust them to deliver

 

Future Nanotechnology advancement with a combination of Artificial Intelligence and machine learning could create tens of millions of jobs

 

The Biden Administration and Europe should be focused on energy savings, not the bullshit of the green new deal.... 

 

The Western government civilizations were built on manufacturing and industrial innovations, not on the internet. Unfortunately, across the United States and Europe many roadblocks are being put in place as a concerted effort to stifle innovation. Governments are short sighted, focusing only on profits, profits, and more profits, hoping that future wealth will work itself out. This kind of thinking is extremely naïve and puts them on a road towards economic collapse. The only way forward is to increase manufacturing in an industrially efficient manner through continuous innovation which will provide increased wealth and sustainability for the average worker.

What is happening in Japan is a perfect example of how a once great producer is suffering a steep loss in market share because of static industrial innovation. The Japanese worker is well-disciplined, and hard-working; however, as a nation they are losing their lead in industries because of a lack of innovation.

 

Interestingly, the social culture in Japan is such that individual personal responsibility is admitted without question. When someone in Japan messes up they admit to their mistake and take appropriate action to fix it. In Western European countries, when a person messes up, they go to church and confess to their priest or pastor to be absolved. In the United States when someone messes up, they lawyer up and hire attorneys to defend them.

 

Green initiatives that replace oil, gas, and coal with electric leave the same size carbon footprint, if not more; it’s a big green scam

 

They are not eliminating greenhouse gases; They are redistributing the carbon print of these gases!

 

The green new dealers have brainwashed the world into believing that electric cars and other alternative energy applications will save the environment. Nothing could be further from the truth. An electric car may not emit exhaust, but the toll it takes on the environment to build one electric car could inflict much greater damage than a gas vehicle. A single 1,000 lbs. battery requires digging up 500,000 lbs. of materials. The amount of minerals and rare earth that will need to be excavated to meet the projected future demand for electric vehicles is expected to increase between 400% and 4000%. Green initiatives do not eliminate carbon footprints, they only redistribute them elsewhere.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XV9ijKAubfU&list=RDCMUCFBMeA1yxZ7g8Z79t0O80-A&start_radio=1

 

United Nations Secretary General Antonio Manuel Guterres should focus on fixing a broken UN; it’s useless system

 

Humanity is waging a false green war on itself

 

How ignorant and irresponsible it is for anyone to label all natural occurrences as climate change disasters. UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said recently, “Humanity is "waging war on nature." Someone needs to explain to him the make up of atmospheric gases. The total share of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is only 0.04%; the percentage of human caused CO2 is only .0016%. Even if you reduce CO2 emission by 45% as Guterres suggests, what difference will it make? The ice age and earth’s warming age that took place millions of years ago were not caused by human energy or food consumption. Are they going to blame methane gas from dinosaur poop as the cause of that warming period? I am going to correct the United Nations useless Secretary General’s statement by saying humanity is "waging a green war on itself.”

 

The United States and Europe could be heading towards economic self-destruction courtesy of the green wave scam

 

Green new deals in the U.S. Europe and other countries are nothing but a scam based on scare tactics that have nothing to do with the environment. Even if the entire western world were to ban all fossil fuels tomorrow, go fully electric using wind, solar and hydrogen, it would not make the slightest difference to the environment. All it will do is lower the average person’s standard of living and bankrupt the middle-class.

 

Present heat waves, monsoons, and wildfires have nothing to do with fossil fuels. They are simply a function of the earth’s natural climate cycle that we must deal with through the development of innovative technologies that will protect us but will not be able to lessen the present and future climate impacts. 

Even moving to hydrogen fueled vehicles as many are advocating is not cost effective. Current technology would make the cost of driving hydrogen fueled cars equivalent to paying $20 per gallon of gasoline. No one could afford that.

 

The German Chancellor wanted Canada to provide liquified natural gas (LNG) but instead Trudeau fobbed him off with useless hydrogen

 

Trudeau is not a true friend to Germany

 

Driving hydrogen fueled cars would cost the equivalent of $20 per gallon of gasoline and is not safe.

 

I do not know whether to cry or laugh about this. On August 23, 2022, the Chancellor of Germany and my useless Canadian Prime Minister signed a green energy deal for Canada to export hydrogen in the form of ammonia to Germany by the end of 2025, to offset Russian gas reduction. The hydrogen production will be via newly built windmill farms that will cost tens of millions. Hydrogen making and transporting can be very dangerous. Carrying a hydrogen tank is like carrying a bomb that is waiting to detonate. Hydrogen used in the fuel cells is a very flammable gas and can cause fires and explosions even when handled properly. Hydrogen can be stored physically as either a gas or a liquid. Storage of hydrogen as a gas typically requires high-pressure tanks (350–700 bar [5,000–10,000 psi] tank pressure). Basically, it’s like storing a bomb waiting to be detonated.

 

The Canadian government will export the hydrogen as an ammonia solution. Once the ammonia is exported to Germany the hydrogen will be extracted from the ammonia which is also an extremely dangerous process. Exposure to just a small amount can cause serious pulmonary issues including lung burns and respiratory failure. Ammonia plants present many dangerous risks, especially when extracting large amounts of hydrogen. The risks associated with ammonia exposure coupled with the dangers of handling potentially volatile hydrogen that can blow the plant to smithereens presents a double dangerous risk factor. Why do the German industrial giants need Canada’s mediocre industrialization to build wind farms and supply them with Hydrogen?

 

Hydrogen plants are extremely costly to build and maintain, and they create a significant safety risk for everyone within many square miles. A few famous quotes attributed to my favorite scientist and true genius Albert Einstein, apply perfectly to this situation, I am sure the stupidity prize belongs to Justin Trudeau and his cabinet. 

 

All the pacific islands are blaming their island erosion on green houses, zero proof


Sea level rise, increasing temperatures and frequency and intensity of tropical cyclones, and storm surges are some of the climate change impacts facing island nations, some of which are in low-lying areas of just 5 meters above sea level at the highest point. Such climate changes are cyclical and have no relation to carbon dioxide and greenhouse gases emissions. Do not blame your geographical position on greenhouse gases emission, there is no science to support your claims.

Climate Change Scam

 

Scientific conclusions should be founded on accurate data and or findings from assimilated experiments


Carbon dioxide only represents .0016% of the total percentage of atmospheric gases; an amount so negligible it is impossible to cause our climate change


It is total madness to suggest that one tenth of 1% of the atmospheric gases drastically could affect the climate


The total share of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is only 0.04%; the percentage of human caused CO2 is only .0016%. The entirety of Earth’s atmosphere is composed of about 78 percent nitrogen, 21 percent oxygen, 0.9 percent argon, and 0.1 percent other gases. Trace amounts of carbon dioxide, methane, water vapor, and neon are some of the other gases that make up the remaining 0.1 percent. Climate change alarmists go around scaring and shaming the public into agreeing to radical politically motivated decisions over trace amounts of so-called “greenhouse gases.” Where is the historic data or the data from scientific experiments that have been conducted that point to all the doom and gloom, they so loudly predict will upend life on Earth as we know it because of the “trace amounts” of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere? It is just not even mathematically possible for so much irreversible devastation to be caused by these tiny trace amounts of atmospheric gases. How can they pseudo scientists make such wild predictions without having any kind of past or experimental data upon which to base their claims? It is ludicrous for them to ascribe catastrophic conclusions because of trace amounts of gases that together add up to one tenth of one percent of the whole. Especially when the so-called science has been so politicized and is used as a tool for some leaders to increase their power.

 

A true and accurate description of climate change by renowned astrophysicist Piers Corbyn

 

A recent interview on the subject of climate change with a renowned astrophysicist did not go as the interviewer expected. The interviewer seemed very surprised when Corbyn did not regurgitate the popular climate change talking points we have all become used to hearing.

HOME

CURRENT ISSUE

INTERVIEW INDEX

CEOCFO SERVICES

CEOCFO MOBILE


EMIL MALAK OP-EDs

Part 1
COVID Scam

Vaccines & Heart Damage

Part 2
Ukraine War Bankrupting Europe

Achieving Lasting Peace in Europe

COVID 19 - I Told You So

February 2020 https://emil-malak.com/articles/Emil_Malak_Op-ed%20_February_2020.pdf


April 2020 https://emil-malak.com/articles/Emil_Malak_Op-ed_April_2020.pdf

Climate Change
Green Wave Scam


Climate change has nothing to do with greenhouse gases, today's politicians are simply "Stupid".

 

A few famous quotes attributed to my favorite scientist and true genius Albert Einstein, apply perfectly to the climate change politicians.

 

Claim: Albert Einstein once said or wrote "Two things are infinite: The universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe," 

 

 

“The height of stupidity is most clearly demonstrated by the individual who ridicules something he knows nothing about.” Albert Einstein

 

“The Difference Between Stupidity and Genius Is That Genius Has Its Limits” Albert Einstein

 

Common-sense is an attribute that for some reason many current Western leaders no longer possess. To quote some renowned thinkers on the topic:

 

"Common sense is not so common," Voltaire

 

Common sense is not a gift, it’s a punishment. Because you have to deal with everyone who doesn’t have it’ (unknown)

 

“It is a thousand times better to have common sense without education than to have education without common sense.” Robert G. Ingersoll 

 

 Last but not least , we all must speak-out.

 “You must be the change you wish to see in the world.” — Gandhi. ...


First Stupidity: how the hell can anyone scientifically back up claims that 1/10 of one percent of greenhouse gases can cause catastrophic climate disasters? Apparently common sense is not so common among so many politically motivated scammers calling themselves scientists.


I fully support fossil fuels; they are the reason we have modern civilization

 

Without fossil fuels like coal, civilization is doomed for failure, which is precisely the goal of the World Economic Forum, George Soros, the green parties, and left leaning political opportunists. The earth’s climate is designed to be cyclical. Temperature changes are normal and necessary. Since the beginning of time the earth has gone through prolonged cooling cycles known as ice ages and heating cycles called interglacial. Variances in temperature are part of the earth’s normal and natural weather cycles. But many are calling attention to these cycles and turning them into cataclysmic, life altering events. Just four years ago Alexandria Ocasio Cortez proclaimed to anyone that would listen that the world would end in twelve years. Soon after, European teenager Great Thunberg shortened it to ten years. They present no science or facts to back their apocalyptic claims because there are none. They know it’s a lie. People would act differently if they truly believed they were on the verge of the end of the world.

 

Unfortunately, European leaders are letting the inmates run the asylum and are listening to the unfounded lies of the doom and gloom prognosticators. They have imposed burdensome regulations and taxes that will have zero effect on the climate but will do everything to make them less competitive and allow China, India, and Russia to overtake them economically.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/13/why-toyota-the-worlds-largest-automaker-isnt-all-in-on-evs.html

 

North American and European countries have committed a grave mistake by departing from Industrial innovations

 

The USA and Europe are falling behind in innovative research within the industrial and manufacturing sectors. If they do change course and encourage a revival of new industrial innovation, we could be relegated to much weaker economic production and a decline in the future standard of living. Today's patent laws in the US are punishing inventors, making it impossible to monetize their inventions. Europe's patent system is not much different. As an inventor myself, I will never patent another invention in the United States. Instead, I will keep it as a trade secret and sell it to the Japanese. They take time but are honorable in their business dealings. As a result, I predict America and Europe will lose 50 million future industrial and manufacturing jobs that could have been created because of the coming nanotechnology revolution.

 

Will Japan move forward in exploring the future industrialization through advancement of nanotechnology applications?

Electric cars are not environmentally friendly and cause great anxiety

 

The truth may be hard to swallow but being politically correct makes me want to throw up!


The green parties are purposely destroying the average person’s hard-earned wealth. Why are many leaders focused on destroying their own industries as a result of green lies with no basis in scientific data?

 

The new green wave being forced upon the world is destroying our industrial output and seriously hampering economic progress. Even Tesla founder Elon Musk, who I personally admire for his industrial brilliance, agreed when he spoke to reporters outside of a conference in Norway this week saying, "Realistically, I think we need to use oil and gas in the short term, because otherwise civilization will crumble."

 

The current radical push to prematurely move away from fossil fuels is hurting Western economies and as Mr. Musk correctly stated will eventually cause civilization to “crumble.” 

 

Elon Musk is an innovative and marketing genius. Despite building Tesla from a startup into the leading electric car maker in the world, he is smart and honest in his acknowledgement that eliminating gas vehicles would destroy our way of life.

 

Interestingly, Toyota, the world’s largest car maker and the company that introduced the first hybrid car is not all in on making electric cars. They do not believe battery-electric vehicles are the only solution to producing more sustainable vehicles and achieving carbon neutrality. During a virtual Automotive Press Association meeting last month, executive vice president of sales at Toyota Motor North America, Jack Hollis said,

“For as much as people want to talk about EVs, the marketplace isn’t mature enough and ready enough ... at the level we would need to have mass movement.”

 

Contrary to what they are saying electric vehicles are horrible for the environment

December 9, 2022 Op-Ed -