Cover Story
CEOCFO
Interview
Index &
Quotes
CEOCFO
Current Issue
Future
Features
Monthly
Analyst
Industry
Review
Analyst
Interviews
and Reports
Corporate
Financials
Archived
CEOCFO
Interviews
About
CEOCFO
interviews.com
Contact
& Ordering |
"To print this page go to file and left
click on print"
A
Bright Shinning Star
Basic Materials
Chemical Manufacturing
NYSE: RPM
RPM, Inc.
2628 Pearl Road
Medina, OH 44258
Phone: 330-273-5090
Frank C. Sullivan
President and
Chief Operating Officer
Interview Conducted By:
Diane Reynolds, Co Publisher
CEOCFOinterviews.com
August 7, 2002
Bio
of President/Chief Operating Officer
FRANK C. SULLIVAN
Frank
Sullivan received his B.A. degree from the University of North Carolina as a Morehead
Scholar in 1983. From 1983 to 1987, Mr. Sullivan held various commercial lending and
corporate finance positions at Harris Bank and First Union National Bank prior to joining
RPM as a Regional Sales Manager at its AGR Company joint venture. In 1989, he became the
Companys Director of Corporate Development. He became a Vice President of the
Company in 1991, Chief Financial Officer in 1993, Executive Vice President in 1995,
President in 1999, and was elected to the additional post of Chief Operating Officer in
October 2001. Frank is the son of Thomas C. Sullivan, Chairman and CEO, and grandson of
Frank C. Sullivan, Sr., founder of RPM.
CEOCFOinterviews: RPM, Inc., please tell my readers a little bit
about this company, how it got started and where it is headed.
Mr. Sullivan:
RPM was founded by my grandfather, also Frank Sullivan in 1947 and after a career in the
industrial maintenance coatings business as Republic Powdered Metals. He founded the business in his garage, named it
Republic Powdered Metals, hoping that people might mistake it for a larger neighbor,
Republic Steel, a company called Republic Powdered Metals.
The first product line was a product called Alumanation. It was an asphalt-based aluminum pigmented roofing
coating and maintenance coating and that really carried the business for many years. In 1963 we first went public, basically on an
intrastate basis within the state of Ohio. We
had our initial public offering on a national basis in 1969. In August of 1971, my grandfather passed away very
suddenly leaving an $11 million dollar business, that was half owned by the Sullivan
family and half owned by the public, to my then 34-year old father, Tom, who has really
been the leader of this business from our growth over the past 30 years to approximately
$2 billion dollars in annual revenues. RPM,
Inc. was formed in 1972 as a holding company and about half of our growth since that time
has been through the acquisition of other leaders in the industrial or consumer specialty
coatings or sealant areas. Today, RPM is
approximately $2 billion dollars in revenues, about half of that is in high performance
industrial coating for concrete or structural steel and construction chemical products. Our businesses are typically the leading brand in
large global markets, like our Carboline business, which is the most specified high
performance coating for structural steel and corrosion control globally, our Stonhard
business, which is the number one producer globally in industrial polymers for floors or
concrete. The other half of RPM is basically
a North American consumer business. Our
leading brands include Rustoleum, DAP caulks and sealants, Zinsser primers and specialty
coatings, and Bondo automotive repair materials, just to name a few. That is RPM today.
CEOCFOinterviews: Between the industrial maintenance products and
the consumer products, where is the majority of the growth?
Mr. Sullivan:
It has been evenly divided between the two. It
has been a balance that we pursued for two decades and it has been an excellent strategy
for us and I think this last year was a good example.
Our industrial businesses are somewhat more impacted by the movements in the
economy, where our consumer businesses seem to be steadier.
For instance, in the last year a number of our industrial businesses have
seen some softening, especially from the recession in North America, typically in the
manufacturing sector, but with the housing boom and a strong consumer, our consumer
segment has more than managed to make up for any short fall in the industrial segment, so
its been a nice mix. In the last year,
we have seen certainly stronger growth out of our consumer business, but over time the two
have been relatively even.
CEOCFOinterviews: With
the big boom in new construction, its interesting how that market has moved so
quickly.
Mr. Sullivan:
Its been tremendous. The opportunities
for the housing market in this country are extraordinary, its the foundation of the
wealth of the average citizen, there is a ton of equity in homes. It has been a great
market for us; however, we do not produce products that generally go into new home
construction. Most of our products are
maintenance and repair products, so certainly the housing boom of the 90s has
created a huge inventory of homes and new homeowners who will be using Rustoleum or other
products to maintain or fix up their homes. That
bodes well for our consumer segment for continued years to come.
CEOCFOinterviews: I think one of the main concerns in the market,
on the resale end, is that mold problem that many people are dealing with today. Do you
deal with that issue?
Mr. Sullivan:
We are. Its certainly an issue in
housing; its been an issue going back to biblical times. There is a reference in the bible to mold in grain
storage areas so its not a new issue for the world.
When it comes up, wherever there is water that can seep into a home because
of bad flashings or a broken HVAC system, things like that, our products can be used to
mitigate water intrusion. In our industrial segment we own a business called Kop-Coat, and
they are a leader in additives to treat wood and lumber.
We are working with a lot of producers of OSB and a number of synthetic wood
products to provide an additive that is a fungicide and a mold resistant product. So there are areas we are working on there that
will help solve that problem in the future for new homes and also be a new growth area for
us. It is certainly an issue that
manufacturers of building products and air conditioning systems, and contractors need to
be aware of.
CEOCFOinterviews: You have 68 plants in 17 countries, how can you
control the quality when its spread out so widely?
Mr. Sullivan:
We have a rather unique operating philosophy that was laid down by my grandfather when he
started RPM. Our mission statement is
simpleHire the best people you can find, create an atmosphere to keep them and
let them do their jobs. Our corporate
staff is 45 people, from our chairman to our receptionist, and we allow a great deal of
autonomy in the management teams that run the RPM companies. I think if you lend people trust and
responsibility, most often you get the same in return and it has worked very well for us. We do have a very sophisticated global
consolidation system that is tied into the general ledger of each one of our companies, so
we can pull the financial data for an income statement, balance sheet and cash flow
statement from any of our legal entities globally, and that helps us to stay on top of the
performance of our companies against budget, as well as to monitor their ability to
continue to grow the business. When we bump
into issues, we are quick to get on a plane or phone to try and understand what is going
on. We also actively travel in this office,
whether it be our audit staff, our chairman or me, to our businesses to keep a close idea
of what is going on. On the other hand, we
pretty much leave the customer interface up to the businesses themselves.
CEOCFOinterviews: Now, as the market grows, as we said the demand
is becoming greater with the boom in the housing, are you able to keep up with the demand?
Mr. Sullivan:
We completed our first ever restructuring over a year ago.
In August of 1999, we announced a restructuring which was the first in
RPMs history and it was pretty much focused on our operations and manufacturing. We had built up some excess capacities as well as
some inefficiency, basically through the acquisition program that had been part of our
growth. We have today a team that is bringing
MRPII Class A manufacturing disciplines into RPMs plants driving efficiencies across
all of our manufacturing operations and it is making a big difference in terms of our
overall costs and our margins by lowering the cash investment required for our businesses,
both on a PP&E and a working capital basis. That
restructuring resulted in the consolidation of 17 manufacturing facilities, and it was
completed in May of 2001. This year our results are up dramatically, as a result of our
restructuring. Even though our revenue
performance overall has been flat, year-over-year, sales among our consumer businesses
have been up 6% or 7%, while our industrial businesses have been impacted by the recession
and have been down by 4% or 5%. Our cash flow
from operations increased from $74 million dollars last year to about $190 million dollars
this year. A big part of that swing has been
attributed to the restructuring and a real focus on operations and efficiency. We are in good shape going forward to keep up with
revenue growth and to put that demand more efficiently on our bottom line.
CEOCFOinterviews: Because you are addressing on a global basis do
you see outside of North America growing quicker right now, would you want to address that
market a little bit closer?
Mr. Sullivan:
We really dont see any global growth in foreign markets right now. While the recession in the manufacturing sector
has been hit hard in North America and has gotten all of the headlines, our European
business has been rather steady, but not terribly dynamic. Our presence in a number of
developing markets has hit some trouble this year. We have a small operation in Argentina,
some business in Brazil, and given the economic disruptions in Argentina, those businesses
have had a difficult time. We export a fair
amount of business to Japan and while that business has been steady, it is not growing
because the Japanese market is not. There
have not been any areas in the manufacturing segment with any real strength, although we
are starting to see today, both in Europe and in North America and other parts of the
world, a firming up of these areas that have been soft for over a year and a half now.
CEOCFOinterviews: What about new products? Is it through R&D or through acquisitions?
Mr. Sullivan: Its a combination. Given the independent
entrepreneur focus of RPM and our operating philosophy, our R&D efforts are very
decentralized. That has been by design and we have looked in the past at the
benefits of consolidating our product development and coordinating it more aggressively,
and decided to manufacture our decentralized product development strategy. Our
companies tend to be leaders in problem solving and bringing out new products, but in our
case it has been very much from the market back into our lab, as opposed to from our lab
out to our markets. I can give you a couple of examples. Years ago, Archer
Daniels Midland was transporting corn syrup for Coca Cola in stainless steel tanker cars
and rail cars. It was very expensive and they were working with our business to develop an
FDA-approved tank lining for carbon steel tanks that would allow them to transport the
same FDA grade liquids in a tanker or rail car that was one third the cost of stainless
steel. We solved that problem for them and cut their costs and their investments in
rail cars by two-thirds. Having solved that problem, we put a new name on that product,
and looked globally to sell it to anyone who was having the same issue, who was investing
heavily in a rather fragile stainless steel tanker or rail car, to transport FDA grade
liquids. We have been very effective in developing new products by being known as a
problem solver in the marketplace, and taking those problems back into our lab and
developing a solution for them and that has been very effective for us.
CEOCFOinterviews: That is a very interesting way of going about it.
Instead of you going to your lab and trying to think of ways to improve things, you
actually take an issue back to your labs and find solutions to fix it.
Mr. Sullivan: Absolutely. I can give you one more quick
exampleabout ten years ago, INTEL was having a lot of problems with a lot of their
cold weather plants with some static electricity build-up, where workers were actually
damaging the micro electronics they were working with. Our Stonhard operation worked with
INTEL to develop a static dissipating floor, basically a polymer for concrete floors that
had special metal filament in it that takes the static electricity out of your body
through your feet into the floor and out of the building. Today, we are the global
leader in the electronics industry for static dissipating floors.
CEOCFOinterviews: Someone looking at this company now is saying
where can they go next?
Mr. Sullivan: We have had issues like everyone else. RPM had a
string thru 1997 of 50 straight years of growth in revenues, earnings and earnings per
share. We actually extended that consecutive growing streak into our 1999 fiscal year,
finishing that record with 52 straight years, the longest running record of consecutive
growth in sales and earnings of any publicly traded company in the United States. It
ended in 2000 with our restructuring and we had to deal with the operating issues as I
mentioned earlier. As a result, our stock, which had provided a 25% compounded rate
of return for more than 20 years to our shareholder base, really stalled, and with the
movement of capital from the manufacturing base and other segments to the dot-coms and
technology in 2000, we saw our stock fall from about $16 down to about $8. With the
restructuring behind us and a shift in confidence in the market, and I think, quite
honestly, the realization that we not only make real things, but also real money, our
stock moved up at about 70 or 80% in the last year, back to the $15 or $16 dollar range.
So if you have been a short-term holder of our stock, we have outperformed any market
index by a wide margin in the last year. If you have been a long-term holder of our stock,
we are back to where we were three years ago. With the manufacturing economy picking up
and this restructuring behind us, I think there is a lot of opportunity for us to grow our
bottom line through internal growth and through some efficiencies we have been working on
for the last couple of years. We have completed 90 acquisitions over the last 30 years,
but because of the restructuring, we have taken a 2-year hiatus from the acquisition
market and we are just now gearing up to pursue acquisitions again, both in our consumer
markets and in our industrial markets much more aggressively. So, from that
perspective, we are much more excited and I think there is a lot more growth to come.
CEOCFOinterviews: What is it you are looking for in an acquisition?
Mr. Sullivan: Typically, we are looking for, first and foremost,
the leading brands in consumer or industrial markets. Brands like Rustoleum, DAP or
Zinsser, and in the industrial markets, names like Carboline or Tremco, which is the North
American leader in construction sealants and waterproofing. Basically, the leading
brands, with good margins and a good management team that can stay and run that business
as part of RPM. We are also looking aggressively at product lines or businesses that
we can acquire and integrate into our existing businesses to leverage the strengths that
we have either in our industrial markets, through distribution and with contractors or
end-users, or in North America through the great relationships we have with retailers like
Home Depot, Lowes and Wal Mart.
CEOCFOinterviews: How quickly can you integrate the acquisition
before you can see the results?
Mr. Sullivan: For stand-alone businesses, we pretty much get them
integrated in about six or eight months, in terms of pulling them into administrative,
purchasing, financial reporting, cash management, and treasury, as we do with any business
or a product line that will be integrated into an existing company. Typically, it takes
about 12 to 18 months from the completion of the acquisition to the point at which we have
completed any of the manufacturing or distribution integration and certain other
operational issues. It takes a lot of attention to details in terms of the
efficiencies you are looking for with the consolidations, taking care at the same time to
see that there are no interruptions in your supply of product or the service to your
customer base.
CEOCFOinterviews: Now what about competition? Do you have any and
how are you dealing with that?
Mr. Sullivan: We have competition all over the place. Many of
our businesses compete against privately held companies or divisions of corporations
globally. It is still a very fragmented industry and there are a lot of opportunities in
some of our industry areas where there isnt a heavy capital requirement for new
start-ups. The competitive landscape depends on what segment of RPM you are talking
about, whether the consumer end or industrial, but these are both highly competitive
industries and I suspect they will continue to be competitive, but you will also continue
to see us have a significant amount of consolidation for many years.
CEOCFOinterviews: What would you say is unique about this company
over your competitors?
Mr. Sullivan: I think the unique thing about RPM is our operating
philosophy and our infrastructure. We have competitors out there who have grown
through acquisitions and have integrated or consolidate everything. We do not.
Half of our businesses are still run by second or third-generation family members
of the families that we bought the businesses from. We have 28 independent reporting
units that report into 6 groups that make up the operations side of RPM. So, our operating
philosophy and the amount of autonomy and really the entrepreneurial focus we have is what
makes RPM rather unique to our competitors. We push as much of the decision-making
and the budget decisions down to the operations as we can and it has made us unique and it
has been a key to our success and to our track record.
CEOCFOinterviews: What do you feel is attractive about RPM to a
potential investor?
Mr. Sullivan: I think today we have demonstrated our ability to
complete this restructuring. If you look at our cash flow from operations it has more than
doubled from year to year. We have a lot of opportunity to get our margins back to
where they were three or four years ago and you will see that margin expansion continue
for the next three or five years, so we do not need a lot of organic growth to really
drive meaningful bottom line improvement. The other exciting growth opportunity is
that, with a very strong cash flow and the distractions of the restructuring now behind
us, and a recently completed equity offering that has strengthened our balance sheet, we
are in a good position to again start making acquisitions very aggressively, which will
accentuate that internal growth and bottom line growth. There are a lot of
opportunities for us to start hitting on more cylinders than we have in the last couple
years, to start generating top line growth, and bottom line growth and we are very excited
about that. When you combine all this with a stock that is trading at only 13 or 14
times earnings and delivering a 4% cash dividend yield, we are a very compelling
investment right now.
CEOCFOinterviews: It sounds like you have a plan and it is neatly
put together.
Mr. Sullivan:
Its worked for 50 years and with a more
competitive environment out there, we had to tackle some operational issues and we did. I can tell you that I am happy to see a return to
some sanity in the markets out there and you know it is unfortunate that all public
companies have been painted with the same broad brush that applies to companies like
ENRON, TYCO and Worldcom. I can tell you from a corporate standpoint, RPM has 12
directors, three of whom are insiders, nine of whom are truly independent without any
material affiliation with RPM, and it has been that way for 30 years. Our audit committee is entirely made up of outside
directors and it has been that way since the 1970s. Our compensation committee is made up
of outside directors and I think that we already comply with all of the compliance
regulations that are being suggested by the NYSE and the SEC. And while it would be nice
to think we are one of few bright shinning stars and a great example, I really think that
95% of all public companies are well run and have good governance. It is unfortunate that people who have not abused
their shareholder base and not abused pay, and have good histories of corporate
governance, are really tainted by the egregious examples of where the investing public has
been hoodwinked and cheated. I think, in the
long run, these issues are helping companies like RPM stand out because people realize we
are well run and we have a good business model. And we havent taken advantage of our
shareholder base or employees. Forty-five
aunts, uncles, brothers, sisters, nieces and nephews of mine are shareholders, and if I
didnt do my job here very diligently and very ethically, I would have to face them
throughout the year. So, besides the 90,000 plus shareholders who have been very loyal and
300 or so institutions, there are still 40 or 50 of my family members whose net worth is
tied up in this company. We take the net
worth of this company and our responsibilities of operating honestly and ethically very
seriously.
disclaimers
© CEOCFOinterviews.com Any reproduction or
further distribution of this article without the express written consent of
CEOCFOinterviews.com is prohibited.
|