Interview with: Edward F. Spink, Chairman and CEO - featuring: their air pollution control technology for a wide variety of air pollution control problems for industries ranging from pulp and paper, wood products, ethanol, mining, non-ferrous metallurgical, iron and steel, chemical, waste processing, waste incineration, power generation, and cement.

TurboSonic Inc. (TSTA-OTC: BB)

wpe3.jpg (15694 bytes)

CURRENT ISSUE    |   COVER ARCHIVES    |       INDEX      |    CONTACT    |    FINANCIALS    |     MARKETING SERVICES   |    HOME PAGE


CEOCFO
-Members Login

Become A Member!

This is a printer friendly page!

TurboSonic increases its presence in Europe, adding to its current markets in North America, South America and China, while diversifying product offerings, to eliminate dependence on any one product or geopolitical influence

wpe11.jpg (5353 bytes)

Engineering Services
Air Pollution Control
(TSTA-OTC: BB)


TurboSonic Inc.

550 Parkside Drive, Suite A-14
Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 5V4
Phone: 519-885-5513

wpe15.jpg (5764 bytes)

Edward F. Spink
Chairman and CEO

Interview conducted by:
Lynn Fosse, Senior Editor
CEOCFOinterviews.com
Published - February 1, 2007

BIO:
C.E.O. and Chairman of the Board - Edward F. Spink
Edward Spink has completed 24 years as a Senior Executive with TurboSonic and has participated in the development of the Corporation and its technology from inception. His leadership and hands-on management style is exemplified by the continued profitable growth of the Corporation. He possesses an excellent engineering knowledge of the TurboSonic technology and is regarded as an expert in the air pollution control industry. Ed has focused TurboSonic's research and development efforts, where possible, on economic payback to investment and superior performance technology in meeting or exceeding regulatory compliance. He possesses an Honours degree in Business Administration from Wilfrid Laurier University.

Company Profile:
TurboSonic Inc. has applied its proprietary air pollution control technology to a wide variety of air pollution control problems for industries ranging from pulp and paper, wood products, ethanol, mining, non-ferrous metallurgical, iron and steel, chemical, waste processing, waste incineration, power generation, and cement.

TurboSonic products offer economic and technical advantages over conventional equipment and are designed to meet the strictest emission regulations.

TurboSonic has maintained their status as a leader in air pollution control technologies through continued research and development programs aimed at creating innovative cost-effective technologies.

CEOCFO: Mr. Spink, what was your original vision and what is your vision today at TurboSonic?
Mr. Spink: “When I started with TurboSonic 27 years ago, we wanted to develop the best air pollution control technology at the best price. The dream in any business is to have the best product and the best price combination. We have a number of things we are working on at present that are promising to help us reach that goal. From the beginning, we have prided ourselves in the in-house development of our technologies. Our experience in various industries, allows us to identify market needs and respond to those needs with the development of new technologies. Since they are, in effect, “sponsored” by the client, the technologies are readily accepted by the industry partner, making commercialization faster.”

CEOCFO: Will you tell us about some of the newer products?
Mr. Spink: “One of the newer things that we are involved in now is alternative materials of construction. You are probably aware of how the cost of commodities has increased over the last few years, particularly alloys such as stainless steels and higher alloys, which in some cases are in the $20 to $40 per pound range. Although their use is necessary, the cost is quite prohibitive. We are working on the development of alternate materials to replace these high priced alloys. The benefit of an alternate material, not only gives us an advantage in the marketplace for our own equipment, but it also has wider applicability across all industries and all uses of these alloys. For example, a module constructed of a high alloy, would cost approximately $1.2 million per unit, whereas the same module constructed using the materials we are developing, would cost about $250 thousand, which is about a five to one ratio.”

CEOCFO: Are your products off-the-shelf, or do you strictly design by request?
Mr. Spink: “Our products are both off-the-shelf and custom-designed; modular in one sense and customized in another sense. Each customer has a unique set of issues that they deal with, such as process gas flow rate, temperature, moisture content and contaminants, which are rarely exactly the same; therefore, you have to customize material of construction and sizing of equipment. In addition, the components that make up a total solution can vary. For example, in some cases, our TurboVenturi Quencher Pre-Scrubber can be placed ahead of our SonicKleen Wet Electrostatic Precipitator in a modular fashion, so that each one has a design basis, but work in tandem. We have automated our design process using 3-D ACAD and computerized sizing and quoting, from input of the client’s process data, through to the quotation and product development process. This streamlining of our design process results in reduced overhead costs and brings us to an optimum cost and profitability standpoint.”

CEOCFO: Will you tell us about the industry in which you are competing and the market opportunity in general?
Mr. Spink: “Due to heavy competition in the marketplace, we strive to be innovative. The goal is to advance your technology base and become the leader in a particular field. In addition, there are many niche areas. We have focused on the wood products and ethanol industries over the last number of years, and have been very successful. There are companies that are by definition competitors of ours, yet we don’t often run into them because they have picked certain niche markets, whereas we have chosen others that are particularly well suited to our knowledge base. We certainly have competitors in each of those areas; however, we focus on the knowledge base of our clientele and on developing products that satisfy their needs and concerns. For example, in the wood products industry we have applied for quite a number of patents, some of which have recently been approved and will be issued in the near future. We recently won a $6.7 million US contract, and it was stated that the main reason we were awarded the contract was because of a new patent application we had submitted. This is evidence of the innovation factor parleying into success in the marketplace.”

CEOCFO: You have had a number of orders recently from Europe; is there a particular thrust into the European market for you?
Mr. Spink: “We are fortunate that we were able to secure the services of Luca Finzi, former president of Hamon Research-Cottrell USA. Mr. Finzi, knows the marketplace and the industry, and has an excellent network of contacts in Europe. He has been instrumental in our initial success. When breaking into a new market, the typical break-even point is two years; however, we have already surpassed this goal in just a number of months. We see great promise here and have barely scratched the surface. We are also conducting pilot tests in Europe, developing new technology for specific clients. Everything is coming together and we believe that our investment in the European operation is going to give us a very handsome payback in the very near future.”

CEOCFO: Do you need to expand your manufacturing or basic facilities as you grow?
Mr. Spink: “We do not do in-house manufacturing, although the new materials we are working on will put us into a different scenario. We do not have a limitation in growth based on production, because we subcontract the actual fabrication. As a result, we can build locally or close to the jobsite, wherever it makes sense. We are not restricted in any way and I think given the changing global market, this is a good position to be in. I find it amazing that it’s cheaper to fabricate in China and ship here, and although I am not a great believer in doing that, it is pretty compelling.”

CEOCFO: What do you see for the pollution control industry going forward and with the new congress in the US do you see any changes of which you could take advantage?
Mr. Spink: “Definitely. When you look at the political climate, Canada has lagged behind the lead of the United States and their environmental regulations, under a republican controlled congress and presidency. With a democratic controlled congress, the strong initiatives by the US, leading the world in pollution abatement regulation, will accelerate. There are certain areas, especially in power-generation and quite a number of other industrial segments that certainly need more stringent regulations; however, one of the benefits is that as the US moves forward in various initiatives to tighten legislation, other areas of the world tend to follow that lead. Europe can be 2-5 years behind and eventually countries like Canada, Mexico, and others pick up the pace. We have done some successful projects in China and the 2010 Olympics in Beijing are one of the motivating forces behind that. There is considerable public support for initiatives in pollution abatement and that can only be good for TurboSonic.”

CEOCFO: What is the financial picture like today for TurboSonic?
Mr. Spink: “We had a million-dollar turnaround year, in spite of significant investment in research and development, with a good balance of improved products and enhanced market prospects going forward. We are making money, but not sitting still in terms of our product offering because industry’s needs do not stand still either. We are in a nice cash position and well positioned to seize opportunities going forward.”

CEOCFO: Why should potential investors be interested and what should they know about TurboSonic that does not jump off the page?
Mr. Spink: “I think we have touched on a number of those areas. Diversification of our products and markets, has a stabilizing effect on performance over time. One of the things that has plagued the air pollution control industry over the last couple of decades is the cyclical nature of regulations and their compliance deadlines. TurboSonic recognizes that by moving around the globe in a strategic fashion, we become risk averse. The EU’s (European Union) growth, and the strength of the Euro, makes the European market a good counter-balance to the North American market and its cycles. The EU has a time lag on US regulations, so that as compliance deadlines pass in the US they are replaced with a surge in the European market. Thus, we began our foray into Europe. We predicted a two-year break-even point; however, we have already surpassed this goal in just a number of months. We also have a presence in South America and in China.  One of the main strengths that we bring to investors is a growing ability to minimize cyclical effects of industry and government regulation through diversification, both in product offerings and our geographic coverage. We are not depending on one sector, one product or one geopolitical influence.”

CEOCFO: Is the investment community taking notice?
Mr. Spink: “To a point, yes. As we grow, we become more visible to the investment community, but it is only very recently that we have tried to tell our story to the investment public. We want to have a good track record and we want to keep that moving forward in a very positive fashion. I think now is an excellent time for TurboSonic and investment in the company.”

CEOCFO: Do you have any final thoughts for our readers?
Mr. Spink: “CapStone Investments, a stock analyst, has moved TurboSonic to a strong buy position. Their independent analysis is that TurboSonic has great promise going forward. As CEO, I am not selling stock because I think it is an excellent investment.”


disclaimers

Any reproduction or further distribution of this article without the express written consent of CEOCFOinterviews.com is prohibited.


“One of the things that has plagued the air pollution control industry over the last couple of decades is the cyclical nature of regulations and their compliance deadlines. TurboSonic recognizes that by moving around the globe in a strategic fashion, we become risk averse. The EU’s (European Union) growth, and the strength of the Euro, makes the European market a good counter-balance to the North American market and its cycles. The EU has a time lag on US regulations, so that as compliance deadlines pass in the US they are replaced with a surge in the European market. Thus, we began our foray into Europe. We predicted a two-year break-even point; however, we have already surpassed this goal in just a number of months. We also have a presence in South America and in China.  One of the main strengths that we bring to investors is a growing ability to minimize cyclical effects of industry and government regulation through diversification, both in product offerings and our geographic coverage. We are not depending on one sector, one product or one geopolitical influence.” - Edward F. Spink

ceocfointerviews.com does not purchase or make
recommendation on stocks based on the interviews published.

.