Vical Incorporated (VICL)
Interview with:
Vijay B. Samant, President and CEO
Business News, Financial News, Stocks, Money & Investment Ideas, CEO Interview
and Information on their
biopharmaceutical products based on its patented DNA delivery technologies.

wpe4D.jpg (6486 bytes)

Cover Story

CEOCFO Interview Index

CEOCFO Current Issue

Cover Story Archives

Future Features

Analyst Interviews

Corporate Financials

Archived Interviews
 

About CEOCFOinterviews.com

Contact & Ordering

This is a printer friendly page!

Vical Incorporated is focused on developing vaccines for infectious disease and cancer using their patented DNA technology

wpe4D.jpg (4714 bytes)

Biotechnology & Drugs
Healthcare
(VICL - NASD)

Vical Incorporated

10390 Pacific Center Court
San Diego, CA 92121-4340
Phone: 858-646-1100

wpe5E.jpg (11136 bytes)

Vijay B. Samant
President and
Chief Executive Officer

Interview Conducted By:
Diane Reynolds
Associate Publisher

CEOCFOinterviews.com
August 2004

BIO:
Vijay B. Samant, President and CEO

Vijay B. Samant joined Vical in November 2000.  Mr. Samant has 23 years of diverse U.S. and international sales, marketing, operations, and business development experience with Merck.  From 1998 to mid-2000, he was Chief Operating Officer of the Merck Vaccine Division.  From 1990-1998, he served in the Merck Manufacturing Division as Vice President of Vaccine Operations, Vice President of Business Affairs and Executive Director of Materials Management.  Mr. Samant earned his MBA from the Sloan School of Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1983.  He received a master’s degree in chemical engineering from Columbia University in 1977 and a bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering from the University of Bombay, University Department of Chemical Technology, in 1975.

Company Profile:
Vical Incorporated (NASD: VICL) researches and develops biopharmaceutical products based on its patented DNA delivery technologies for the prevention and treatment of serious or life-threatening diseases. In addition, the company has gained access to enhancing technologies through licensing and collaborative agreements.

Product development efforts include:
Vaccines for use in high-risk populations for infectious disease targets for which there are significant U.S. needs, Vaccines for general pediatric or adult populations for infectious disease applications for which a challenge model or accepted surrogate marker are available, and cancer vaccines or immunotherapies that complement the company’s existing programs and core expertise.

For opportunities outside these areas, Vical plans to continue leveraging its patented technology through licensing and collaborations. In addition, the company plans to use its expertise, infrastructure, and financial strength to explore in-licensing or acquisition opportunities.

CEOCFOinterviews: Mr. Samant, please give our readers a brief description of Vical Incorporated.

Mr. Samant: “We are a product development company that is exclusively focused on developing vaccines for infectious disease and cancer and all of our products are based on our patented DNA technology, which is known as Plasmid DNA Technology. This technology actually does not require handling of the pathogen itself but you actually use just the gene sequences from the pathogen to invoke an immune response. Our focus is vaccines in infectious disease and cancer and we are one of the few vaccine companies in the United States today. We are a company that is dedicated to discovering and developing new vaccines where no vaccines exist and doing it all with a brand new technology which is going to create a paradigm shift in the entire vaccine business.

This is a sleeper kind of business, because it has been around for a number of years. Only three or four companies have spent the past 60 years developing vaccines and the reason other companies haven’t gotten into this business is because the vaccine business is focused entirely on the basis of know how, in terms of large physical assets. Most of these big companies have physical assets in excess of $3-$4 billion dollars. Then proprietary knowledge is next. Know-how, proprietary knowledge and intellectual property have kept basically a lot of the other companies out of it. Four major companies control it; even a company like Pfizer is not in the field of vaccines.

Our goal is really to use our new innovative technology to create a paradigm shift so that vaccine development becomes a much easier task for other companies. We are the sole owners of this proprietary technology and if we could make vaccine development be a much easier task, a much more cost efficient task, the timelines for developing vaccines will be much shorter. If you go back in the history of vaccine development, about a dozen vaccines have been introduced in this country over the last 60 years. You are talking about one vaccine every five or six years. That’s not a very productive way of developing vaccines and we believe that if our technology is successful in creating that paradigm shift that we’ll develop vaccines for a number of diseases where vaccines are very badly needed today.”

CEOCFOinterviews: What are the percentages of focus between infectious disease and cancer?

Mr. Samant: “If you compare infectious disease and cancer I would say they were 70-30, 70% for infectious disease and 30% for cancer.”

CEOCFOinterviews: You are also working in collaboration on Ebola and West Nile Virus.

Mr. Samant: “That is correct. We are one of the largest vaccine collaborators with the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which is a federal government organization; the federal government funds it and it has given out a lot of a lot of monies to a lot of small biotech companies. A lot of people claim that they are collaborating with the NIH, but most of the collaboration is reflected through the payments that they have received from NIH. We are really a true collaborating company with NIH; we collaborate with them in a number of ways. They are using our core technology to develop four vaccines. Those four vaccines, you covered two of them, Ebola, HIV, SARS and West Nile Virus. Secondly we have actually manufactured those four vaccines, so we supply the goods to them.

In some cases we bring forth collaborative research work. One example is West Nile where we have a CRADA, which is a collaborative agreement where the research that comes out of our collaborative work is jointly owed by two parties, in this case NIH and Vical. Finally, they give us money for developing an anthrax vaccine, which is our vaccine, but they have given us so far almost $7 million for the anthrax vaccine program. They have also given us $1 million dollars for our CMV vaccine program. We also have commercialization rights for the Ebola vaccine from them; we have actually licensed those rights from them. Although it is our technology, the U.S. government owns the gene sequence for the Ebola virus and they have given us rights to use it.

We also have rights to use the gene sequence for the West Nile Virus from the CDC, which is the Centers for Disease Control. Besides doing all of this collaboration activity, the NIH has actually funded the major portion of our new manufacturing facility. We are very excited because the NIH can work with a number of companies and a number of technologies, and they have decided to use our platform to develop vaccines for some of the most important targets.”

CEOCFOinterviews: Where are you in clinical studies with your vaccines?

Mr. Samant: “Our cancer vaccine, Allovectin-7 completed a Phase II trial and if everything goes through with the FDA we will begin Phase III trial next year either on our own or in partnership with someone else. Our CMV and anthrax vaccines are in Phase I. I hope our West Nile Virus vaccine and our SARS vaccine with NIH will enter human trials by the end of this year. Ebola entered clinical trials last year and our HIV vaccine collaboration with NIH is in Phase I. Those are some of the vaccines we are doing with the NIH. The Merck HIV vaccine is already in Phase I, with plans to go into phase II shortly. Merck is our exclusive partner with HIV. The two angiogenesis programs are in Phase II, the one with Corautus will enter phase IIB and hopefully if we are successful with the two programs with Aventis Pharma, one of these programs will enter Phase III sometime next year. So, this is a snapshot of where we are. We also have a number of animal health vaccines, which are not approved by the FDA but are approved by the Department of Agriculture. They are in various stages of development and those are very fast approvals.”

CEOCFOinterviews: These are areas that seem to be a growing concern nationwide.

Mr. Samant: “Absolutely, since your brought it up, the West Nile vaccine, although it is only entering Phase I, can get very rapidly fast tracked for two reasons, to conduct a Phase III trial for West Nile would be impractical because we really don’t know where the disease actually occurs, the target becomes very large and impractical. However, all of a sudden the West Nile Virus continues and there are a sporadic number of deaths in the United States, the U.S. government may take a drastic measure and approve this vaccine based on the Animal Rule. The Animal Rule is basically, showing effectiveness of this vaccine in two animal models and then showing safety in humans and that is a way the FDA defines for certain pathogens that are impractical to conduct a clinical trial. So if this disease gets severe, that pathway can be opened in the U.S. government. One single injection of our West Nile construct or a similar construct based on our technology has shown to protect horses against a challenge. So the vaccine is very energetic with our core technology we just have to go through the steps and see how severe this disease is.”

CEOCFOinterviews: Is all of your technology based on the DNA patents?

Mr. Samant: “All of our technology is patented and all of our programs are based on our technology.”

CEOCFOinterviews: All plasmid DNA?

Mr. Samant: “All plasmid DNA, which is a ring of DNA, not just one ring but a multiple of rings, is injected into the muscle cells and in that ring is coded a certain gene sequence and once that gene sequence is taken up by the muscle cell’s nucleus, the muscle cell’s nucleus takes the gene sequence and makes the protein that is coded in the gene sequence.”

CEOCFOinterviews: How do you fund all of your projects?

Mr. Samant: “First of all, we ended the last quarter with $94 million dollars in cash. In today’s modern environment that’s a very healthy cash balance. Our burn rate in the past has been in the low 20’s, so there is not a panic for a company like us to go out and raise money next year. We just raised money recently so the market is able to produce us some money. We are very judicious on how we spend money. That is the reason why our cash balance is very healthy. A number of our programs with NIH are basically fully funded, so, we have the upside of being successful in the programs and at the same time we do not have to pay for a lot of those programs. We have a healthy set of revenues from our contract manufacturing agreements, where we supply our vaccine.

We supplied a DNA vaccine to the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, which is a Gates-funded organization for doing a DNA vaccine trial for HIV in China. We also do a number of activities for the Department of Defense. So, there is cash flow coming from revenues, which are contract manufacturing revenues; there is cash flow coming from NIH’s grant; and we receive milestones. We have received about $50 million dollars in milestones in the last seven years from our pharmaceutical partners. Some of those partners which you may be aware of are Merck -- they paid us about $25 million dollars over the past few years, Aventis Pharma, Aventis Pasteur is another, Merial, the world’s largest animal health is a partner with us and Aqua Health, which is developing a vaccine for fish is also a partner for us. So we have a number of companies who have collaborated with us over the past number of years who strongly believe in the value of this technology. So, a combination cash coming from milestones, contract revenues, NIH grants and our own cash will support our need to take these programs to a level of success where our investors will make more money.”

CEOCFOinterviews: As far as manufacturing the DNA, I think it says that a gram is ready in 3-4 months, how do you constantly keep on top of this?

Mr. Samant: “The amount of material that goes into a dose is less than half a milligram; it is in microgram quantities; if you make 1 gram of DNA that is a lot of DNA. If there is 1 gram of DNA that is 1,000 milligrams or 1 million micrograms, so if you were to use 100 microgram dose those 100 doses. The quantities in grams may sound ridiculously low from a traditional pharmaceutical perspective but from a vaccine perspective those are pretty big measurements.”

CEOCFOinterviews: Where do you do all of the DNA manufacturing?

Mr. Samant: “We have two facilities, an old one where we currently make all of our clinical supplies and we have constructed a brand new facility which is in the process of being started up right now and will eventually be the cornerstone of all DNA vaccine supplies.”

CEOCFOinterviews: What do you feel was your biggest hurdle to come to this point?

Mr. Samant: “I think the biggest hurdle was the fact that any technology you first come out with, people get very excited about it and they expect instant gratification from a new technology. As in any new technology it has to be debugged, improved and validated and that is a lot of hard work and a lot of people don’t have the patience to allow the company to complete that hard work and that has taken a lot of effort of some of our partners, especially Merck, to take this technology to a level where we can now reap the benefits. That technology is close to validation and it has taken almost 10 years. But we are there now.”

CEOCFOinterviews: Are there any other companies out there that you would like to partner with who may be able to benefit from what you have to offer?

Mr. Samant: “Most of our partnerships have been with companies that understand the advancements in vaccine. Remember when I had mentioned to you the four companies that understand vaccines, they were Merck, Aventis, Wyeth and Glaxo. These companies are keeping an eye on us because they know we can create a paradigm shift in this business. We would really like to work with large pharmaceutical companies who do not have a vaccine presence and would like to get into vaccines. They are really vaccine naive, they don’t have the background and knowledge in vaccine development, and they may have a lot of expertise in product development and bring in a lot of cash. An example of one of these companies could be 3M because they are a company who is trying to get into the pharmaceuticals business, has a lot of capability in device manufacturing and has done a lot of work in pharmaceuticals and they would be the perfect company to partner with us. There are a lot of other companies who aren’t traditional vaccine companies that we would like to work with.”

CEOCFOinterviews: How about competition in your area?

Mr. Samant: “Well, the competition is conventional vaccine methodology, which is killed vaccines, live or attenuated vaccines and subunit vaccines; a number of companies are working on those.   Those small companies do not have the critical masses like the large four companies to bring those products home based on their technology so they aren’t a competition for us. The big four are basically competition because they have resources and lots of money; however, they aren’t nimble enough to work on some of the targets we are working on. For example, our CMV vaccine we are working on, none of the big companies are working on it because the potential market size is too small to be attractive for them, somewhere around $200 or $300 million dollars. The big companies will only work on vaccine targets that will bring them a billion dollars a year.  We aren’t too scared of the big companies and the small companies -- there are a lot of them working on vaccines using conventional methods -- and we believe they are doomed to failure.

It’s our own internal development, which is our competition. The key issue here is focus, if we get distracted and start to work on too many things, we will lose track on what we really set out to do. My challenge is keeping my development organization focused in making sure to bring those vaccines that we have embarked on to the market place before they get distracted and want to do a lot of other things, because a scientist usually and generally likes to do a lot of other things. Our development is a very important focus and the level of discipline that is required in that development comes with experience and fortunately we have a lot of people with product development experience.”

CEOCFOinterviews: You have talked about some of the smaller companies, would you consider any of them to be an acquisition possibility?

Mr. Samant: “I have not seen any small company in the field of vaccine area where I have gotten excited that if we merge with them there would be a synergy or if we acquired them we would be creating more value. Instead of acquiring companies, we need to acquire technologies and product applications to further advance the value of these technologies that is where the goal should be for us. I don’t see many opportunities from my end, in the law of jungle if I am a leopard I’m looking at animal structures that are lower and comparable to me, but if there are lions and elephants then the perspective on us may be different.”

CEOCFOinterviews: Tell us about your vaccine developing team.

Mr. Samant: “Developing vaccines by conventional methods is a very hard process; about 10-12 vaccines were approved in the last 60 years. That means not a lot of people were actually apart of the vaccine development in the United States. By definition, since only 10 vaccines were approved in the last 60 years, unless you are a very old person who started working at age 5, there is no one who is around who has seen all of the vaccines approved in this country. There are 20-40 people in this country who have actually really participated in the development in a vaccine that has been approved by the FDA. I have been fortunate myself to be a part of 3 such approvals. Am I lucky? Yes, I was at the right place at the right time and as a result I have gained a lot of experience. A number of individuals in my organization had the chance to work on various elements of a vaccine development, perhaps, not as comprehensively as I have done. The bottom line is that we have a very experienced vaccine development team that I have put together in the last 3 years. I have hired people from across the world -- about 25 of the best vaccine developing individuals in the world and we believe that besides the four major companies, we have the best critical mass of vaccine developers in the world.”

CEOCFOinterviews: In closing, what would you say to a potential investor?

Mr. Samant: “Anyone can check on the management creditability. We are a very ethical company. We have no liability, no lawsuits, no debt. We have a great management team, a topnotch board with the level of experience that they bring. We have a brand new facility and great partners, there isn’t much more that you would want. The company has been around for a long time and I have been with the company since 2001.”

disclaimers

Any reproduction or further distribution of this article without the express written consent of CEOCFOinterviews.com is prohibited.

Newsflash!

To view Releases highlight & left click on the company name!

 

ceocfointerviews.com does not purchase or make
recommendation on stocks based on the interviews published.

.